NPROSE,PROSENEF,PSCS

U.S. District Court
Eastern District of New York (Brooklyn)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:26-cv-01117-NRM-PK


Aranovsky v. Porzio et al
Assigned to: Judge Nina R. Morrison
Referred to: Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo
related Case: 1:25-cv-06128-NRM-PK
Case in other court: New York Southern, 1:26-cv-01181
Cause: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act
Date Filed: 02/26/2026
Jury Demand: Plaintiff
Nature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: Other
Jurisdiction: Federal Question
Plaintiff
David Aranovsky represented byDavid Aranovsky
13 O'Connor Avenue
Staten Island, NY 10314
917-541-8737
Email: david@ubiqu.io
PRO SE

V.
Defendant
Hon. Ralph J. Porzio
in his individual capacity 		represented byMatthew W. Henry
Office of the New York State Attorney General
Litigation Bureau
28 Liberty Street
17th Floor
New York, NY 10005
212-416-8554
Email: matthew.henry@ag.ny.gov
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Defendant
Marc Jonas Block, Esq.
individually and as agent of the Ishimbayev Law Firm P.C. 		represented byMarc Jonas Block
The Law Offices of Marc Jonas Block
40 River Road
Ste 19h
New York, NY 10044
646-821-3607
Fax: 212-602-0077
Email: marcjblock@gmail.com
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Defendant
Ishimbayev Law Firm P.C. represented byMarc Jonas Block
(See above for address)
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Defendant
Dmitriy Ishimbayev, Esq.
individually and as principal of the Ishimbayev Law Firm P.C. 		represented byMarc Jonas Block
(See above for address)
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Defendant
Jorge Dopico
Chief Attorney of the Attorney Grievance Committee for the First Judicial Department 		represented byMatthew W. Henry
(See above for address)
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Defendant
Yakov Boyarsky
as an individual 		represented byMarc Jonas Block
(See above for address)
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Defendant
Larissa Boyarsky
as an individual 		represented byMarc Jonas Block
(See above for address)
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Date Filed #Docket Text
02/12/20261 COMPLAINT against Marc Jonas Block, Esq(as agent of the Ishimbayev Law Firm P.C.), Marc Jonas Block, Esq(individually), Dmitriy Ishimbayev, Esq(individually), Dmitriy Ishimbayev, Esq(as principal of the Ishimbayev Law Firm P.C.), Ishimbayev Law Firm P.C., Ralph J. Porzio. (Filing Fee $ 405.00, Receipt Number 46752) Document filed by David Aranovsky. (sac) [Transferred from New York Southern on 2/26/2026.] (Entered: 02/13/2026)
02/12/20262 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (sac) [Transferred from New York Southern on 2/26/2026.] (Entered: 02/13/2026)
02/12/2026 Case Designated ECF. (sac) [Transferred from New York Southern on 2/26/2026.] (Entered: 02/13/2026)
02/12/2026 Magistrate Judge Gary Stein is designated to handle matters that may be referred in this case. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (sac) [Transferred from New York Southern on 2/26/2026.] (Entered: 02/13/2026)
02/12/20263  MOTION re: for Expedited Case Management and Scheduling Conference. Document filed by David Aranovsky. (sac) [Transferred from New York Southern on 2/26/2026.] (Entered: 02/13/2026)
02/12/2026  SUMMONS ISSUED as to Marc Jonas Block, Esq(as agent of the Ishimbayev Law Firm P.C.), Marc Jonas Block, Esq(individually), Dmitriy Ishimbayev, Esq(individually), Dmitriy Ishimbayev, Esq(as principal of the Ishimbayev Law Firm P.C.), Ishimbayev Law Firm P.C., Ralph J. Porzio. (sac) [Transferred from New York Southern on 2/26/2026.] (Entered: 02/13/2026)
02/12/20265 PRO SE CONSENT TO RECEIVE ELECTRONIC SERVICE. The following party: David Aranovsky consents to receive electronic service via the ECF system. Document filed by David Aranovsky. (jjc) [Transferred from New York Southern on 2/26/2026.] (Entered: 02/17/2026)
02/13/2026 CASE MANAGEMENT NOTE: For each electronic filing made in a case involving a self-represented party who has not consented to electronic service, the filing party must serve the document on such self-represented party in a manner permitted by Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b)(2) (other than through the ECF system) and file proof of service for each document so served. Please see Rule 9.2 of the courts ECF Rules & Instructions for further information. (sac) [Transferred from New York Southern on 2/26/2026.] (Entered: 02/13/2026)
02/13/20264  STANDING ORDER IN RE CASES FILED BY PRO SE PLAINTIFFS (See 24-MISC-127 Standing Order filed March 18, 2024). To ensure that all cases heard in the Southern District of New York are handled promptly and efficiently, all parties must keep the court apprised of any new contact information. It is a party's obligation to provide an address for service; service of court orders cannot be accomplished if a party does not update the court when a change of address occurs. Accordingly, all self-represented litigants are hereby ORDERED to inform the court of each change in their address or electronic contact information. Parties may consent to electronic service to receive notifications of court filings by email, rather than relying on regular mail delivery. Parties may also ask the court for permission to file documents electronically. Forms, including instructions for consenting to electronic service and requesting permission to file documents electronically, may be found by clicking on the hyperlinks in this order, or by accessing the forms on the courts website, nysd.uscourts.gov/forms. The procedures that follow apply only to cases filed by pro se plaintiffs. If the court receives notice from the United States Postal Service that an order has been returned to the court, or otherwise receives information that the address of record for a self-represented plaintiff is no longer valid, the court may issue an Order to Show Cause why the case should not be dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with this order. Such order will be sent to the plaintiffs last known address and will also be viewable on the court's electronic docket. A notice directing the parties' attention to this order shall be docketed (and mailed to any self-represented party that has appeared and has not consented to electronic service) upon the opening of each case or miscellaneous matter that is classified as pro se in the court's records. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 3/18/2024) (sac) [Transferred from New York Southern on 2/26/2026.] (Entered: 02/13/2026)
02/17/2026 MAILING RECEIPT: Document No: 4. Mailed to: David Aranovsky 13 O'Connor Avenue Staten Island, NY 10314. (nb) [Transferred from New York Southern on 2/26/2026.] (Entered: 02/17/2026)
02/18/20266  ORDER : Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE no later than February 25, 2026 as to why this action should not be transferred to the Eastern District of New York. In the alternative, if Plaintiff is willing to transfer this action to the Eastern District of New York, the Court requests that Plaintiff submit a letter stating that he consents to the transfer of this action to the Eastern District of New York, no later than February 25, 2026. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 2/18/2026) (sgz) [Transferred from New York Southern on 2/26/2026.] (Entered: 02/18/2026)
02/19/20267  MOTION for Permission for David Aranovsky to participate in electronic case filing in this case. Document filed by David Aranovsky. (mml) [Transferred from New York Southern on 2/26/2026.] (Entered: 02/20/2026)
02/19/20269 PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re: 6 Order to Show Cause. Document filed by David Aranovsky. (mml) [Transferred from New York Southern on 2/26/2026.] (Entered: 02/20/2026)
02/19/2026 ***DELETED DOCUMENT. Deleted document number 8 Notice. The document was incorrectly filed in this case. (mml) [Transferred from New York Southern on 2/26/2026.] (Entered: 02/24/2026)
02/25/202610  ORDER: The Court recognizes that Plaintiff would prefer to stay in this District, as he chose this forum. Dkt. No. 9. Having considered the relevant factors, the Court believes that the interests of justice are better served by transferring this case to the Eastern District of New York. Although Plaintiff's choice of forum weighs against transfer, several other factors-including the convenience of witnesses and parties, the location of relevant evidence, and the locus of operative factsweigh in favor of transfer. As a result, this case will be transferred to the Eastern District of New York. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Clerk of Court is directed to transfer this case to the Eastern District of New York without delay. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 2/25/2026) (sgz) [Transferred from New York Southern on 2/26/2026.] (Entered: 02/26/2026)
02/25/2026 CASE TRANSFERRED OUT ELECTRONICALLY from the U.S.D.C. Southern District of New York to the United States District Court - District of Eastern District of New York.(sgz) [Transferred from New York Southern on 2/26/2026.] (Entered: 02/26/2026)
02/26/202611 Case transferred in from District of New York Southern; Case Number 1:26-cv-01181. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. (Entered: 02/26/2026)
02/26/202612 Clerk's Notice Re: Consent. A United States Magistrate Judge has been assigned to this case and is available to conduct all proceedings. In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent, the assigned Magistrate Judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to this Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. Any party may withhold its consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent.The form may also be accessed at the following link: https://www.nyed.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/uploads/mjconsentform.pdf (KD) (Entered: 02/26/2026)
02/26/2026 The case of Aranovsky v. Porzio et al, has been transferred from Southern District of New York (Foley Square) to the Eastern District of New York. The new case number is 26-cv-1117.
PLEASE NOTE: if you plan to continue representing your client(s), you must be admitted to practice before this court. You must do so by applying for Pro Hac Vice or permanent admission. To apply for Pro Hac Vice admission, you must first register for an ECF login and password. Please visit the Court's website at www.nyed.uscourts.gov/attorney-admissions for guidance. Once registered, you must electronically file a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. You must pay the required pro hac vice fee online. (KD) (Entered: 02/26/2026)
03/01/202613 Pro Se Consent to Electronic Notification by David Aranovsky. (SG) (Entered: 03/02/2026)
03/01/202614  MOTION for Leave to File Document - Second Amended Complaint, filed by David Aranovsky. (w/ Pltff's Memorandum of Law is part of this Motion and included on Page #1 of this submission) (SG) Modified on 3/2/2026 (SG). (Entered: 03/02/2026)
03/02/2026 Email Notification Test - DO NOT REPLY (SG) (Entered: 03/02/2026)
03/03/2026 ORDER granting 14 Motion for Leave to File. Plaintiff shall file the amended complaint as a separate docket entry on or before March 10, 2026. Ordered by Judge Nina R. Morrison on 3/3/2026. (MM) (Entered: 03/03/2026)
03/06/202615 AMENDED COMPLAINT (w/ Jury Trial Demand) against Marc Jonas Block, Esq, Dmitriy Ishimbayev, Esq, Ishimbayev Law Firm P.C., Ralph J. Porzio, Jorge Dopico, Yakov Boyarsky, Larissa Boyarsky, filed by David Aranovsky. (SG) (Entered: 03/06/2026)
03/06/202616 NOTICE of Request for Issuance of Summonses for All Defendants, filed by David Aranovsky. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service, # 2 Pro Se Pltff Proposed Summons Forms) (SG) (Entered: 03/09/2026)
03/10/202617 Summons Issued as to Larissa Boyarsky, Yakov Boyarsky, Jorge Dopico. (SG) (Entered: 03/11/2026)
03/10/202618 NOTICE/PLTFF'S MOTION for Order directing Clerk to issue Summonses for all defendants, filed by David Aranovsky. (w/ Proposed Order enc.) (SG) Modified on 3/13/2026 to add motion (RO). (Entered: 03/11/2026)
03/13/2026 ORDER: Plaintiff's 18 Motion is granted. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to issue a summons from this Court for defendants Hon. Ralph J. Porzio, Marc Jonas Block, Esq., IshimbayevLaw Firm P.C., and Dmitriy Ishimbayev, Esq. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo on 3/13/2026. (RO) (Entered: 03/13/2026)
03/19/202621 PLTFF'S NOTICE of Pending Court Order Directing Clerk to Issue Summonses, filed by David Aranovsky. (SG) (Entered: 03/23/2026)
03/20/202619 Letter Motion to Compel Issuance of Summonses and Notice of Clerk's Noncompliance filed by David Aranovsky. (RO) (Entered: 03/20/2026)
03/20/202620 Summons Issued as to Marc Jonas Block, Esq, Dmitriy Ishimbayev, Esq, Ishimbayev Law Firm P.C., Ralph J. Porzio. (SG) (Entered: 03/20/2026)
03/20/2026 NOTICE TO PRO SE PARTY: For all future filings in this action, please follow the instructions from the Court's website for uploading attachments for docketing available at the following link: Pro Se Docketing Instructions. All communications with Chambers must be made through the Court's Electronic Case Filing system (ECF). E-mails are permitted only if directed by the Court. (RO) (Entered: 03/20/2026)
03/31/202622 SUMMONS Returned Executed by David Aranovsky. Marc Jonas Block, Esq served on 3/24/2026, answer due 4/14/2026; Larissa Boyarsky served on 3/20/2026, answer due 4/10/2026; Yakov Boyarsky served on 3/20/2026, answer due 4/10/2026; Jorge Dopico served on 3/30/2026, answer due 4/20/2026; Dmitriy Ishimbayev, Esq served on 3/27/2026, answer due 4/17/2026; Ishimbayev Law Firm P.C. served on 3/27/2026, answer due 4/17/2026; Ralph J. Porzio served on 3/23/2026, answer due 4/13/2026. (SG) (Entered: 04/01/2026)
03/31/202623 PLTFF'S NOTICE of Collusion and Post-Service Cover-Up: Two Categories of Fraud, filed by David Aranovksy. (SG) (Entered: 04/01/2026)
04/02/202624 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Marc Jonas Block, Esq. (Block, Marc) (Entered: 04/02/2026)
04/06/202625 PLTFF'S MOTION/Request for Certificate of Default Judgment and Criminal Referral, filed by David Aranovsky. (w/ Certificate of Service and Exhibit A enc.) (Please Note: Pltff did not file a Declaration in Support of Request nor the Proposed Certificate of Default to his submission) (SG) (Entered: 04/06/2026)
04/06/2026 REQUEST for Certificate of Default is denied at this time for the following reasons: 1. The time for Defendants to file an Answer has not yet expired.

2. Local Rule 55.1(a)(3) requires that a proposed Clerk's Certificate of Default be accompanied with the request.

3. Local Rule 55.1(a)(4) requires that a certificate of service be accompanied with the request showing that the foregoing documents have been personally served on, or mailed to the last known residence (for an individual defendant) or business address (for other defendants) of, the party against whom default is sought. re 25 Request for Certificate of Default, (JP) (Entered: 04/06/2026)

04/12/202626 NOTICE of Appearance by Marc Jonas Block on behalf of Marc Jonas Block, Esq, Larissa Boyarsky, Yakov Boyarsky, Dmitriy Ishimbayev, Esq, Ishimbayev Law Firm P.C. (aty to be noticed) (Block, Marc) (Entered: 04/12/2026)
04/12/202627 Request for Certificate of Default as to Defts Yakov Boyarsky and Larissa Boyarsky, filed by David Aranovsky. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Clerk's Certificate of Default, # 2 Affidavit of Mailing) (SG) (Entered: 04/13/2026)
04/13/202628  MOTION to Strike 26 Notice of Appearance -The Criminal Filing of Defendant Marc Jonas Block, filed by David Aranovsky. (SG) (Entered: 04/13/2026)
04/14/202629 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew W. Henry on behalf of Jorge Dopico, Ralph J. Porzio (aty to be noticed) (Henry, Matthew) (Entered: 04/14/2026)
04/14/202630  MOTION for pre motion conference re 15 Amended Complaint by Jorge Dopico, Ralph J. Porzio. (Henry, Matthew) (Entered: 04/14/2026)
04/14/2026 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: In the 24 Waiver of Service, Mr. Block affirms under the penalty of perjury that he "is not a party to this proceeding." However, Mr. Block is a named party in this action.

Moreover, Plaintiff 25 raises a potential conflict of interest between Mr. Block as a named defendant and in his role as purported counsel to the other defendants on whose behalf he has appeared 26 .

No later than April 22, 2026, Mr. Block is ordered to show cause why he filed an affirmation that appears to be inaccurate and how he will address the potential conflict of interest between him and the co-defendants he is representing. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo on 4/14/2026. (CCR) (Entered: 04/14/2026)

04/15/2026 ORDER. The Court is in receipt of 30 Motion for pre motion conference, which the Court construes as the motion to dismiss as to Defendants Porzio and Dopico. Plaintiff is respectfully directed to respond to the motion on or before April 29, 2026. The Court will issue a subsequent order if it concludes that a reply is necessary. Ordered by Judge Nina R. Morrison on 4/15/2026. (MM) (Entered: 04/15/2026)
04/15/202631 Request for Certificate of Default as to Deft Hon. Ralph J. Porzio filed by David Aranovsky. (SG) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/16/2026: # 1 Proposed Clerk's Certificate of Default, # 2 Affidavit of Mailing) (SG). (Main Document 31 and Attachments 1 and 2 replaced on 4/16/2026 to correct File Date to 4/15/2026) (SG). Modified on 4/16/2026 to correct File Date to 4/15/2026.(SG). (Entered: 04/16/2026)
04/15/202632  MOTION to Strike 30 MOTION for pre motion conference re 15 Amended Complaint as a Fraudulent Instrument and Notice of Joinder in the Enterprise, filed by David Aranovsky. (SG) (Entered: 04/16/2026)
04/15/202633  MOTION to Vacate ORDER ECF 31 as void for Lack of Jurisdiction and Manifest Bias, filed by David Aranovsky. (SG) (Entered: 04/16/2026)
04/15/202634 NOTICE of MOTION for Permission for Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF), filed by David Aranovsky. (SG) (Entered: 04/16/2026)
04/16/2026 REQUEST for Certificate of Default is denied at this time. It does not appear from the Summons Returned Executed that proper service was effected. re 27 Request for Certificate of Default, 31 Request for Certificate of Default, (JP) (Entered: 04/16/2026)
04/16/202635  MOTION to Vacate Court Order to Construe OAG Dead Letter #30 As Motion to Dismiss As Void for Lack of Jurisdiction and Manifest Bias (CORRECTED), filed by David Aranovsky. (SG) (Entered: 04/16/2026)
04/16/202636 Request for Certificate of Default filed by David Aranovsky. (SG) (Entered: 04/16/2026)
04/16/202637 NOTICE of Proposed Clerk's Certificate of Default, filed by David Aranovsky. (Attachments: # 1 Proof of Envelope) (SG) (Entered: 04/16/2026)
04/16/202638 AFFIDAVIT of MAILING for Request for Certificate of Default and Proposed Clerk's Certificate of Default mailed on 4/15/2026 by David Aranovsky. Person served - Deft Marc Jonas at his last known address, as specified in the Request for Entry of Default/Certificate of Default dated 4/13/2026 - See DE # 36 . (Attachments: # 1 Request for Entry of Default/Certificate of Default, # 2 Proposed Clerk's Certificate of Default) (SG) (Entered: 04/16/2026)
04/16/2026 REQUEST for Certificate of Default is denied at this time. It does not appear that proper service was effected from the Summons Returned Executed [DE#22]. re: Request for Certificate of Default (JP) (Entered: 04/16/2026)
04/17/202639 NOTICE of Inquisition of State Actor Clerk "JP" for Administrative Fraud and Joinder in the RICO Enterprise, filed by David Aranovsky. (SG) (Entered: 04/17/2026)
04/17/2026 The Court is in receipt of pro se Plaintiff's 39 Notice and enters this order to clarify the posture of this case and the parties' pending motions.

Plaintiff is advised that CPLR § 312-a, pursuant to which Plaintiff represents in 22 Notice that he attempted to effect service, requires "two copies of a statement of service by mail and acknowledgement of receipt" be included with the complaint and summons. Pursuant to Section 312-a, "first-class mail service is complete only if defendant returns a signed acknowledgement of receipt." Ananda Cap. Partners, Inc. v. Stav Elec. Sys. (1994) Ltd., 753 N.Y.S.2d 488, 489 (N.Y. App. Div., 1st Dept 2003) (emphasis added). There is no indication on the docket that these acknowledgement of receipt forms were either included with Plaintiff's mailings or returned to him executed. Thus, because service was not effectuated under Section 312-a or any other provision of the CPLR, the Clerk of the Court properly denied Plaintiff's request to enter a default judgment.

Moreover, default judgment is not automatic, Lopez v. New York City Tourism + Conventions, Inc., No. 24-CV-7106 (DEH), 2025 WL 1159216, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 21, 2025), and "default judgments are disfavored" because "[a] clear preference exists for cases to be adjudicated on the merits," id. At this time, all Defendants have made appearances through counsel, with one set of Defendants waiving service, see 24 Waiver of Service, and another set of Defendants responding to the complaint with a motion to dismiss, see 30 Motion. Default is not appropriate at this juncture, and Plaintiff's 28 32 33 35 Motions are denied. Plaintiff is respectfully directed to make no further requests for entry of default at this time.

By docket Order dated April 15, 2026, the Court construed the 30 Motion for pre motion conference as Defendants Porzio's and Dopico's motion to dismiss. If Plaintiff wishes to respond to this motion, he may do so by filing his opposition on the docket on or before April 29, 2026.

Finally, Plaintiff is advised that direct, ex parte communications with the Court via telephone and email are not permitted under this Court's rules. Plaintiff is respectfully directed to make no further attempts to communicate with the Court via telephone or email. All communications with the Court must be made via filings to the public docket. Ordered by Judge Nina R. Morrison on 4/17/2026. (MM) (Entered: 04/17/2026)
04/18/202640 NOTICE of Inquisition of Judge "MAMA" Morrison's Sur-Reply and Ex Parte Collusion "Construed" As Grand Guardianship of the RICO Enterprise, filed by David Aranovsky. (SG) (Entered: 04/20/2026)
04/20/202641 AFFIDAVIT/AFFIRMATION re Order to Show Cause,, by Marc Jonas Block, Esq (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - Written Consent) (Block, Marc) (Entered: 04/20/2026)
04/21/202642 NOTICE OF "Because Trust Me Bro" Confession by RAISINBREAD RICO RASCAL DEFAULTEE MARC JONAS BLOCK, filed by David Aranovsky. (SG) Modified on 4/21/2026 (SG). (Entered: 04/21/2026)
04/21/202643 NOTICE of The "Canary In The Coal Mine": The Forensic Evaporation of ISHIMBAYEV.COM AND Prisoners Dilemma, filed by David Aranovsky. (SG) Modified on 4/21/2026 (SG). (Entered: 04/21/2026)
04/21/202644  MOTION for Recusal /DEMAND FOR RECUSAL OF RAISINBREAD RICO RINGLEADER JUDGE NINA R. MORRISON, filed by David Aranovsky. (SG) (Entered: 04/21/2026)
04/21/202645  MOTION to Compel Production of Missing Exhibit "A" Referenced in Deft Block's AFFIRMATION (DOC 41 ), filed by David Aranovsky. (SG) Modified on 4/21/2026 (SG). (Entered: 04/21/2026)
04/21/202646 NOTICE of PROPOSED ORDER to Strike Fraudulent Certificate and Enter Default Judgment, filed by David Aranovsky. (SG) (Entered: 04/22/2026)
04/22/202647 NOTICE of (PROPOSED) Order for Default Judgment and Permanent Injunction for All Defendants, filed by David Aranovsky. (SG) (Entered: 04/23/2026)
04/22/202648 (COPY) NOTICE of (PROPOSED) Order for Default Judgment and Permanent Injunction for All Defendants, filed by David Aranovsky. (SG) (SG) (Entered: 04/23/2026)
04/24/202649 NOTICE OF Judge "MAMA" Morrisons Raisinbread RICO Red-Headed Stepchild ISHIMBAYEVS Website Forensic Autopsy, filed David Aranovsky. (SG) (Entered: 04/24/2026)
04/27/202650 NOTICE of Inquisition: Ex-Lax Parte E-Mail Defecation by EDPA's Consigliere Costello, Google's Marginal Margo, Temple's High Priest Evangelist and Medium's Gavone Bono, filed by David Aranovsky. (SG) (Entered: 04/27/2026)
04/28/202651 Letter MOTION for pre motion conference for proposed motion to dismiss claims by Marc Jonas Block, Esq, Larissa Boyarsky, Yakov Boyarsky, Dmitriy Ishimbayev, Esq, Ishimbayev Law Firm P.C.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - Order in Underlying Action, dated January 20, 2026) (Block, Marc) (Entered: 04/28/2026)
04/29/202652  MOTION to Strike Deft Marc Block's ECF 51 Letter MOTION for pre motion conference for proposed motion to dismiss claims and Criminal Referral: The Forensic Collapse of the "Restrepo" Fabrication, filed by David Aranovsky. (SG) Modified on 4/29/2026 (SG). (Entered: 04/29/2026)
04/29/202653 NOTICE of Inquisition of Magistrate "Camouflage" Kuo: The Overt Sham "Order to Show Cause" framed as "Potential Conflict of Interest," filed by David Aranovsky. (SG) (Entered: 04/29/2026)
04/29/202654 REPLY in Support re 51 Letter MOTION for pre motion conference for proposed motion to dismiss claims and in response to letter of plaintiff Aranovsky 52 filed by Marc Jonas Block, Esq, Larissa Boyarsky, Yakov Boyarsky, Dmitriy Ishimbayev, Esq, Ishimbayev Law Firm P.C.. (Block, Marc) (Entered: 04/29/2026)
04/30/202655 NOTICE of Desperate Derelict Dirty Rascal Marc Jonas Blocks Failed Attempt to "Un-Restrepo" the Noose He Put Around His Own Neck: Runs Crying to RICO Ring-Leader Mama Morrison, filed by David Aranovsky. (SG) (Entered: 04/30/2026)
04/30/2026 ORDER. The Court is in receipt of the 51 Letter Motion for pre motion conference. Pursuant to the Court's Individual Rule 5.1.1, "[p]re-motion conferences are not required in... cases in which one or more parties are proceeding pro se." If the moving Defendants wish to have the Court construe the 51 Letter as the motion itself, they may inform the Court on or before May 4, 2026. Moreover, if the moving Defendants wish to file anything further in support of the motion, they may do so by May 11, 2026. The Court will set additional submission deadlines for the parties, including pro se Plaintiff, depending upon how the moving Defendants indicate they wish to proceed. Ordered by Judge Nina R. Morrison on 4/30/2026. (MM) (Entered: 04/30/2026)
05/01/202656 RESPONSE to Motion re 51 Letter MOTION for pre motion conference for proposed motion to dismiss claims filed by Marc Jonas Block, Esq, Larissa Boyarsky, Yakov Boyarsky, Dmitriy Ishimbayev, Esq, Ishimbayev Law Firm P.C.. (Block, Marc) (Entered: 05/01/2026)
05/01/202657 REPLY in Support re 30 MOTION for pre motion conference re 15 Amended Complaint , Order,,, filed by Marc Jonas Block, Esq, Larissa Boyarsky, Yakov Boyarsky, Dmitriy Ishimbayev, Esq, Ishimbayev Law Firm P.C.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - Order dated March 26, 2026) (Block, Marc) (Entered: 05/01/2026)
05/04/202658 NOTICE of National Emergency and Litigation Hold Notice: Rainbow RICO Short-Bus Trip to Amarillo for Mama Morrison, Papa Patel, and Cugina Costello; Notice of the Death of Woke Ideology and the Exposure of Deep State's Recursive Trump Assassination Attempts, filed by David Aranovsky. (SG) (Entered: 05/04/2026)
05/04/2026 ORDER. The Court is in receipt of private Defendants' 56 57 filings. The Court construes the 51 Letter Motion for pre motion conference as the motion itself. Plaintiff is respectfully directed, on or before May 15, 2026, to respond to the arguments set forth in the 51 Letter Motion and the 57 Reply.

The Court further notes that Plaintiff did not respond to the 30 Motion, filed by the public Defendants, by the April 29, 2026 deadline the Court previously set. If Plaintiff wishes to respond to the 30 Motion, he may do so on or before May 15, 2026. Ordered by Judge Nina R. Morrison on 5/4/2026. (MM) (Entered: 05/04/2026)
05/05/202659 NOTICE of The "Mysterious" Update of EDNY's Judge Morrison's "Practice Rules": Throws Her Own Transgender Agenda Under the Bus - 7 Days Before Engaging With Her Inquisitor, filed by David Aranovsky. (SG) (Entered: 05/06/2026)
05/06/202660 COPY of NOTICE of The "Mysterious" Update of EDNY's Judge Morrison's "Practice Rules": Throws Her Own Transgender Agenda Under the Bus - 7 Days Before Engaging With Her Inquisitor, filed in Case #2:25-cv-6797 - (MKC) by David Aranovsky. (SG) (SG) (Entered: 05/06/2026)
05/13/202661 "NOTICE of Precedent," filed by David Aranovsky. (SG) (Entered: 05/13/2026)
05/13/202662 NOTICE of Coordinated cowardly coverup by Babelonian monks and Deep-state co-conspirators EDNY Clerk "SG" and EDPA Clerk "DT" filed by David Aranovsky. (ENE) (Entered: 05/14/2026)

PACER Service Center
Transaction Receipt
05/14/2026 10:22:52
PACER Login: lasttribunal Client Code:
Description: Docket Report Search Criteria: 1:26-cv-01117-NRM-PK
Billable Pages: 9 Cost: 0.90